The surprising details of fashion entrepreneur Christine Hunsicker’s fraud indictment

Clothing tech entrepreneur and CaaStle founder Christine Hunsicker is out on $1 million bail after she was charged on six counts of cheating customers out of more than $300 million over the past six years in a complex fraud scheme that inlcuded wire fraud, securities fraud, money laundering, making false statements to a financial institution, and aggravated identity theft.

Hunsicker pleaded not guilty in a Manhattan federal court on Friday, after she turned herself in to authorities, and could face decades in prison if convicted, according to CNBC, who reported that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a related civil lawsuit.

Here’s what to know about the indictment.

Why was Hunsicker indicted?

Jay Clayton, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, who was working with the FBI, announced on Friday that Hunsicker is charged with forging documents, fabricating audits, and making material misrepresentations about her company’s financial condition in an alleged scheme to defraud investors in her clothing technology companies CaaStle Inc. and P180.

The documents allege she continued to solicit millions of dollars in investments for both companies and “persisted in her scheme” even after law enforcement agents approached her about the fraud.

“The promise of pre-IPO technology companies can be fertile ground for fraudsters who play on investor euphoria,” Clayton said in a statement.

According to the statement, the fashion tech entrepreneur and founder of CaaStle, a “clothing-as-a-service” business that enabled clothing brands to rent inventory to consumers, promoted the company “as a rapidly growing business valued at more than $1.4 billion, [although she] knew that CaaStle was in financial distress with limited cash and significant expenses.”

To raise the capital for CaaStle’s operations, she “provided investors with falsified income statements, fake audited financial statements, fictitious bank records, and sham corporate documents that grossly overstated CaaStle’s operating profit, revenue, and available cash.”

Surprising details in Hunsicker’s indictment

The indictment alleges, among other things, that Hunsicker provided two fabricated audits to investors and conducted internet searches for the terms “fraud,” “created an audit firm fake,” and “JP morgan 4m records faked,” an apparent reference to fraud charges related to JPMorgan Chase’s acquisition of her college financial aid startup called Frank, which resulted in the federal prosecution of its founder Charlie Javice. (Javice was convicted in March of defrauding JPMorgan Chase of $175 million by exaggerating her customer base tenfold, according to National Public Radio.)

It also accuses Hunsicker of fabricating the existence of CaaStle shareholders, falsely claiming that the shareholders needed money for a “family health emergency” or due to the FTX cryptocurrency exchange collapse. She allegedly then used investors’ money to raise new capital for CaaStle, while concealing that the company needed cash. And to “maintain the fiction,” she issued fake capitalization tables to the investors in order to demonstrate that they had purchased existing CaaStle shares.

According to the documents, Hunsicker’s scheme also allegedly involved providing an investor with a fake screenshot of CaaStle’s bank accounts showing nearly $200 million in available cash, although the company had less than $200,000 in available cash at the time, in or around September 2024.